Russians convinced authorities have nothing to say about Medvedev film
The authorities have no answer to the investigation of Dmitry Medvedev's "secret real estate," almost 40% of respondents believe. The rest insist that officials do not have to defend themselves and respond to "absurd accusations."
"Discrediting by demagogy"
Russian officials have nothing to respond to the claims by Alexey Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) against Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. Therefore, politicians "pretend that nothing has happened." This opinion is shared by 38% of the polled by Levada Center. The study was conducted from March 31 to April 3 among 1.6 thousand people in 48 regions of the country.
According to 19% of respondents, the authorities do not have to justify themselves and "drop their authority" and that officials do not consider it necessary to respond to "absurd accusations of people who discredited themselves with political demagogy and criminal actions." Almost a quarter of the respondents were undecided.
"He is not your Dimon"
On March 2, the Anti-Corruption Foundation released an investigation and a film about Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev’s residences and related funds that received 70 billion rubles of donations. On March 26 people of Moscow and dozens of major cities took to the streets demanding that the authorities react to the FBK’s footage. The largest rally was held in Moscow, and resulted in the detention of over a thousand protesters.
Medvedev reacted to the investigation a month later and called it "compote" and "dregs". The State Duma did not support the Communists who demanded checking the facts set forth by FBK.
In 2014, the citizens had an impression that Russia was a besieged fortress, now this view is being eroded, said Alexey Makarkin, the vice-president of the Center for Political Technologies. "When you are in a besieged fortress, you cannot criticize its commandant. And the one who shouts that the commandant in the basement has cheese and wine and needs to be dealt with is an enemy agent," the political scientist believes.
Today, according to Makarkin, the society is divided in half: one half still believes that one cannot be critical of the authorities, whereas the other half has a complicated attitude towards them. A large part of these 38% is among those 82% who approve the president, stressed Makarkin. "That is, you still can not touch the tsar, but you can fight the boyars," the political scientist concluded.
38% of the respondents have either seen the FBK’s film or are familiar with its content, or have heard something about it. The rest do not know anything about the Foundation’s investigation. These figures suggest that the state counterpropaganda has backfired, and opposition leader Alexey Navalny has become a politician of the federal level, believes Konstantin Kalachev, the head of the Political Expert Group.
"The citation level was raised by those Navalny critics, who began to deal with justifications. The first reaction was the right one, silence. By engaging in a discussion, quoting, just mentioning, you pour water on the opponent's mill, because everything except for an obituary is advertising. Medvedev himself was silent for a long time, but after the rallies it was impossible to remain silent," sums up the political scientist.
The overwhelming majority of those who know about the FBK film believe that the corruption schemes described in the investigation are either true or very close to it. Only 16% believe that Navalny’s movie does not correspond to reality. And three-quarters of those who watched the film and believed Navalny call what they saw "a typical phenomenon, a manifestation of the decay of Russian regime."
"Visions of corruption in the country's leadership have existed for a long time and are already rooted in the society," said Stepan Goncharov, Levada Center sociologist. He stressed that Navalny’s foundation only made the topic more polular, triggering people to take to the streets on March 26.
Similar figures were seen in late December 2015 after Navalny's investigation of the business empire of Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika’s sons. Then, about 38% of the polled heard about the FBK film, 78% of them either found it to be truthful, or did not discover anything new. Among those who found the investigation plausible, 82% called the corruption schemes described and links with criminal groups a typical phenomenon.
A St. Petersburg company Renessans-Restavratsiya JSC, involved in a criminal case under Art. 169 (Swindling) of the Russian Criminal Code, has been selected to receive the contract. The case was initiated in September 2017 in connection with the failure to perform 4-million-ruble ($70 thousand) works to restore a XVI-century fortress in the Leningrad region.
Banker, son of thief in law. Ukraine accuses heir to Tyurik’s business empire of contracting killers to assassinate Voronenkov
On October 9, the Ukrainian Prosecutor General has provided names of the people charged with the murder of fugitive ex-Deputy of the State Duma Denis Voronenkov. According to the Ukrainian investigators, the assassin’s paymaster is Vladimir Tyurin, ex-common-law spouse of Maria Maksakova, the widow of Voronenkov, while his son Dmitry Tyurin is the intermediary who had delivered the money to the killers. The CrimeRussia has inquired into the role of Tyurin junior in the business of his father and why one of the leaders of the Russian criminal world wouldn’t sacrifice his son for the purposes of revenge.
The honored operative, who had taken part in the investigation into Colonel Yuri Budanov’s murder, has allowed an intermediary from Aslan Gagiev to get a picture of a letter about the crimes committed by the assassins’ OCG in exchange for $100 thousand.
A resident of Omsk told about the demand to pay for refueling an ambulance car for the father's transfer from the village to the hospital. As a result, her parents paid 500 rubles ($9) to get her father to the hospital.
ICR checks into Federal Penitentiary Service officers covering up criminal search dept head’s son in drug investigation
Ishimbay (Republic of Bashkortostan) Deputy Police Chief’s son got away with a major drug offence, as the CrimeRussia reported earlier. 4 of his buddies are facing major prison sentences. However, the committee turned its attention to the story once more.