Investigation finds it unnecessary to explain essence of charges in case of Seventh Studio to court
The case regarding director Kirill Serebrennikov will be considered in the new judicial composition.
The Moscow City Court overturned the decision of the first instance on returning the criminal case of the Seventh Studio directed by Kirill Serebrennikov the Prosecutor’s Office due to a number of shortcomings. At the same time, the representative of the investigation refused to answer the court’s claims and assured that the case was initiated lawfully, Kommersant reports.
On September 11, Moscow’s Meshchansky District Court returned the case to the Seventh Studio, because in the case materials, it did not find indications of specific activities of the theatrical project Platforma which did not take place due to theft of budget money. In addition, the investigation did not describe the role of the Seventh Studio’s general producer Alexey Malobrodsky after his dismissal in August 2012, as well as did not take into account 2.8 million rubles ($ 43,000) in calculating the amount of damage.
In the Moscow City Court, prosecutor Mikhail Reznichenko said that 2.8 million rubles were stolen but withdrawn from the funds. Reznichenko did not explain Malobrodsky’s role in assisting the defendants – “hands are tied by law.” Also, the investigation did not bother to explain what money the defendants actually stole. “The court is not limited in making decisions without their (actions) instructions,” the prosecutor said.
The Meschansky Court will consider the case in the new judicial composition.
According to the investigators, in 2011-2014, the Seventh Studio received money from the state budget for the implementation of the Platform project, but a number of performances did not take place due to the stolen 133 million rubles ($ 2 million). The charges are based on the testimony of the Seventh Studio’s accountant Nina Maslyaeva, whose criminal case was severed from the other charges. Maslyaeva is the only defendant who pleaded guilty.
The defendants in the case are the artistic director of the Gogol Center and the founder of the Seventh Studio Kirill Serebrennikov, its former CEO Alexey Malobrodsky, director of the Russian Academic Youth Theater (RAMT) Sofya Apfelbaum, former CEO of the Seventh Studio Yuri Itin and its former producer Yekaterina Voronova, who is put on the wanted list.
According to Olga Halikova, the lawyer representing the injured party, the girls could have been petrified of punishment for spending too much money. The victims’ defense also intends to challenge Maria Khachaturian’s insanity conclusion.
There is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed or Why does State Duma Vice-Speaker Lebedev keep his marriage bonds secret?
Russian Minister of Internal Affairs Vladimir Kolokoltsev has approved the dismissal of two police officers “for gross violation of official discipline,” which consisted of checking the so-called department of Nadezhda Grishaeva, the wife of nationalist Liberal Democrats leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky's son, Igor Lebedev, using information systems. It turned out that undeclared property and business of the vice speaker of the State Duma was registered in her name. However, Lebedev’s property is registered not only in his spouse’s name, but also in that of his mother Galina Lebedeva, as well as his close friends. The CrimeRussia found out the ex-basketball player Nadezhda Grishaeva's current affairs, how rich the 70-year-old Galina Lebedeva is, and what her son, 47-year-old parliamentarian Igor Lebedev, is hiding.
The court decision is based on the fact that Montenegro is allegedly not the legal successor of the Union of Serbia and Montenegro and therefore should not be liable for its obligations under the investment protection treaty with the Russian Federation.