Moscow MIA Deputy Chief suspected of billion-ruble embezzlement
Major General Alexander Petrikov manages all the rear services in the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the Russian capital.
Alexander Petrikov, the head of the logistics department and the Deputy Chief of the Moscow MIA, is suspected of embezzling a billion rubles ($17m), according to Mash Telegram Channel. No details have been reported.
According to the official website of the Moscow MIA, Major General of Internal Service Alexander Petrikov has occupied leading positions in the rear and economic divisions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the capital since 2010, when he was appointed head of the MIA Transport Support Center in Moscow.
He became the head of the MIA Main Center for Economic, Transport and Service Support in January 2013, and was appointed by presidential decree Deputy Chief of the Russian MIA in Moscow, the Chief of Logistics, on December 31, 2014.
Alexander Petrikov became Major General of Internal Service in July 2016.
The scheme could not work without employees of the housing maintenanceagency of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Further, the investigation is aimed at detaining military officials who are in charge of this program.
The State Duma has held a tender to select an organization that would conduct an analytical study of cryptocurrency and blockchain. The winner of the tender is the Financial University under the Russian government, which is ready to do it for 1.9 million rubles ($33 thousand).
Head of the Tolyatti Department of Urban Development Customer Service Management, Natalya Soboleva, and chief specialist of the same management Sergey Aydashkin are suspected of receiving a large bribe. A preventive measure has already been elected for them.
New details have become known about the arrest of the head of Russian Youth League's St Petersburg and Leningrad region department. The MIA Main Directorate in St. Petersburg has instituted three criminal investigations due to fraudulent activities in the agency.
The court ruled 127 knife wounds and an 11-year custodial sentence are enough to make it right. A 20-year-old man was killed in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk on October 3, 2016. But was there just one killer? Inability to answer this question was the reason the media covered the complicated case after the police made a mistake and gave the killer’s telephone number to the victim’s parents. Reading his messages made them believe he was not the only killer. Did the police fail to go after the other killers due to their family members been high-ranking police officers? What other explanations to the criminals still at large are there?